The blogging universe is a continually fascinating one with a lot of talents, a lot of energy. It has lifted off from where the web was in 1997 or so and continues the main principles that was so prevelant during that time. Free-ranging mind and
spirit in the midst of the crowded, dirty, dangerous world. The colonists with nothing in the midle of the Empire and its army of dark wraiths. The rag-tag revolutionaries ducking behind rocks and bridges as the trained, austere, cold-blooded troops mass in front of the village green. It's all that has been good and human about America.
The assistance to freed slaves; the schooling to the illiterate immigrant. It can be at any rate. It's a lot of hype as well.
It reminds me that amatuers, dedicated and devoted, are the ones who usually start the new science. We might like to think it's the "system" but it rarely is. The "system" comes in later and imposes the new order on everything.
And I'm certain that kiddies will learn blogging in elementary school if they aren't already.
False hierarchies are already being established. Bloggers are in conflict over whether they are in-training for the big-leagues or a new game in town.
The American Journalism Review, which is better than the Columbia Journalism Review, always says something about blogging. Journalists are envious and fascinated and encourage the bloggers to develop resources that the real journalists can use.
One thing to note: The vast public knows little about blogging, could care less, wouldn't know how to use blogs, and see the internet as, at best, a portal into AOL so they can retrieve e-mail. Even subscribers to Sunoasis have written to me, "what's all this blog thing?"
So, you have the same phenomena as occured in the early stages of both the computer and internet innovations: A group of people adapting very quickly to the innovation, making a beachhead, then rolled over by time as the institutions and general public catch up.
Ignore the false hierarchies, the false channels that now impose themselves by fiat because no one is competing with them.
Why would the blogs escape the fate of all other good things the net has served up?
The book, "We Media," is getting a lot of reviews I notice. I've read a few chapters in it and it's worth looking through. However, I have a hard time seeing armies of citizen-journalists out there working on a daily basis to improve the lot of the community. I do see pr types, marketers, conmen, and other low-lifes using the blogs or "we media" as a way to cast nets further into the community. When I got online
usenet was the big thing; what is being said about blogs was said about usenet. And that, last I looked, has fallen to the very bottom of the barrel of porn and con. Next on the list were the mailing lists. Mailing lists that are maintained in a strict environment and monitored are still ok. But many have gone by the wayside because of their misuse.
E-mail is in the middle of a titanic struggle against spam and virus's. E-mail has become a necessity for many but it is in danger of going the way of usenet. RSS feeds are touted
because they by-pass e-mail. Why blogs will have a different fate is beyond me. The serious, literate, original blogs will be marginalized; the spam, porn blogs will crowd
everything out and get the money. And instead of delivering a new medium that creates a perfect democracy you will have the perfect demonstration of mob rule. The internet will be utterly destroyed as a populist medium and be fully controlled by corporations.
That I believe is the sorry fate.
However, we go on. And do our best. And try to point a few things out. And be honest.
And funny. And rational.